Make vs Zapier (2026): Which Automation Platform Is Better?
Data-backed comparison of Make and Zapier on pricing, features, complexity handling, and cost at scale for business automation.
Last updated: February 19, 2026
Quick Verdict by Use Case
Easiest setup with linear workflow model, 7,000+ integrations, and AI Copilot builder
Canvas-based scenario builder with advanced branching, error routes, and data mapping
Core plan at $9/month for 10K credits vs Zapier's $19.99/month for 750 tasks
7,000+ integrations vs Make's 3,000+ — better for niche or specialized tools
Our Verdict
Zapier wins on simplicity and app coverage (7,000+ integrations, easiest setup). Make wins on visual control and cost efficiency ($9/month for 10K credits vs $19.99 for 750 tasks). Switch to Make when workflow complexity or cost pushes past Zapier's sweet spot.
Try the Winners
Zapier
Best for: Beginners and non-technical users, Maximum app coverage
Make
Best for: Complex visual workflows, Cost-efficient scaling
Still deciding? Our AI Tool Decision Matrix lets you compare features, pricing, and fit for your team. ($9)
Choose Zapier for the easiest setup and broadest app coverage (7,000+ integrations). Choose Make for complex workflows and cost efficiency ($9/month for 10K credits vs Zapier's $19.99 for 750 tasks). At 10,000+ monthly actions, Make saves over $90/month. Both have free tiers — test your most common workflow on each before committing.
TL;DR
- Easiest setup: Zapier — linear workflows, AI Copilot, most integrations
- Best visual builder: Make — canvas-based scenarios with branching and error routes
- Best value: Make Core at $9/mo for 10K credits (Zapier is $19.99 for 750 tasks)
- Most integrations: Zapier with 7,000+ vs Make’s 3,000+
- Budget pick: n8n (free self-hosted) — see our n8n vs Zapier vs Make comparison
What happens when your Zapier bill hits $400 a month?
That’s not hypothetical — it’s what happens at 50,000 monthly tasks on Zapier’s pricing model. The same volume on Make costs approximately $29/month. The difference: $4,400+ per year.
The workflow automation market reached an estimated $27 billion in 2026 (Mordor Intelligence), growing at 9.4% CAGR. As businesses automate more processes, the choice between these two platforms increasingly comes down to a question of scale: Zapier’s simplicity works at low volumes, but Make’s pricing model dominates as workflows grow.
Zapier has automated 81 billion tasks for 3+ million users and generates approximately $310 million in annual revenue (SQ Magazine). Make offers 3,000+ integrations including 350+ AI-specific connectors and was recently enhanced with AI Agents and an MCP Server on all paid plans.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $9/mo (10K credits) | $19.99/mo (750 tasks) |
| Free Tier | 1,000 credits/month | 100 tasks/month |
| Integrations | 3,000+ (350+ AI) | 7,000+ |
| Workflow Model | Visual canvas (branching) | Linear step-by-step |
| Billing Unit | Credits (per module action) | Tasks (per action step) |
| AI Features | AI Agents, AI Toolkit, MCP Server | Copilot, Tables, MCP Server |
| Error Handling | Visual error routes | Basic retry |
| Scheduling | 1-min intervals (paid) | Various intervals |
| Self-Hosting | ||
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Easy |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 1,000 credits/mo, 2 scenarios | 100 tasks/mo, two-step only |
| Entry Paid | Core: $9/mo (10K credits) | Professional: $19.99/mo (750 tasks) |
| Mid-Tier | Pro: $16/mo (10K credits, priority execution) | Team: $69/mo (2K tasks, 25 users) |
| Team | Teams: $29/mo (10K credits, roles/permissions) | — |
| Enterprise | Custom (SSO, 24/7 support) | Custom (admin controls, VPC) |
Cost at Scale
The pricing difference becomes dramatic as automation volume grows:
| Monthly Volume | Make (Core) | Zapier (Professional) | Savings with Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 actions | $9/mo | $19.99/mo | $11/mo ($132/yr) |
| 10,000 actions | $9/mo | $100+/mo | $91+/mo ($1,092+/yr) |
| 50,000 actions | $29+/mo | $400+/mo | $371+/mo ($4,452+/yr) |
Important caveat: “Credits” (Make) and “tasks” (Zapier) are not directly equivalent. Make charges for every module action in a scenario — a 5-step workflow uses 5 credits per run. Zapier counts each successful action step but excludes built-in tools (Filter, Formatter, Path, Delay, Looping). The actual cost comparison depends on your workflow structure.
Pricing was last verified on February 19, 2026 from Make pricing and Zapier pricing.
Where Make Wins
Visual Workflow Control
Make’s canvas-based scenario builder lets you see your entire automation as a visual flowchart. Add branching paths (if/else), parallel execution, error routes, and iterators — all visible on a single canvas. Zapier’s linear model works for simple automations but becomes unwieldy when workflows require conditional logic or multiple outcomes.
Cost Efficiency at Scale
At $9/month for 10,000 credits, Make costs a fraction of Zapier at comparable volumes. For growing businesses that automate client onboarding, marketing workflows, or data pipelines, Make’s pricing model scales sustainably. Zapier’s per-task pricing creates cost pressure as automation adoption grows across a team.
Advanced Error Handling
When a step fails in Make, error routes let you define what happens next: retry, skip, alert, or route to a fallback workflow. This visual error handling is critical for production automations where failures need graceful recovery. Zapier offers basic retry but lacks Make’s visual error route system.
Where Zapier Wins
Integration Breadth
With 7,000+ app integrations, Zapier connects to roughly 2x more apps than Make. If you use niche industry tools, specialized SaaS products, or less common apps, Zapier is more likely to have a ready-made connector. Make’s 3,000+ integrations cover all major platforms but may require HTTP modules for niche tools.
Simplicity and Speed
Zapier’s linear workflow model is easier to understand: Trigger → Step 1 → Step 2 → Step 3. The AI-powered Copilot can build entire automations from natural language descriptions. Most simple Zaps take under 5 minutes to create. Make’s power comes with a steeper learning curve.
Bundled Tools
Zapier now includes Tables (database), Forms (data collection), and an MCP Server for AI agent integration on all plans at no extra cost. This turns Zapier from a pure automation tool into a lightweight business operations platform — useful for teams that need a simple database and form builder alongside their automations.
Who Should Choose What
| If you need… | Choose | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Fastest first automation | Zapier | 5-minute setup, AI Copilot builder |
| Complex branching logic | Make | Visual canvas with error routes |
| Cheapest at scale | Make | $9/mo for 10K credits vs $100+ on Zapier |
| Most app integrations | Zapier | 7,000+ vs Make’s 3,000+ |
| Training non-technical team | Zapier | Lower learning curve, guided templates |
| Production-grade error handling | Make | Visual error routes with fallbacks |
| AI-native automation | Make | AI Agents, AI Toolkit, 350+ AI connectors |
| Even cheaper self-hosted option | n8n | Free unlimited — see comparison |
Methodology
We tested both platforms across identical automation scenarios covering CRM sync, email workflows, data pipelines, and multi-step conditional logic over a 30-day period. Pricing was verified from official vendor pages on February 19, 2026. Cost projections are based on monthly billing rates and standard tier pricing.
For the full three-way comparison including the self-hosted option, see n8n vs Zapier vs Make. For individual reviews: Make review and Zapier review.
Get the AI tools briefing
Weekly briefing: best tools, honest comparisons, workflow automations. No sponsor influence.
No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is easier for beginners, Make or Zapier?
Zapier is easier for beginners. Its linear step-by-step workflow model requires minimal setup knowledge, and the AI-powered Copilot can build automations from natural language descriptions. Make's canvas-based visual builder is more powerful but has a steeper learning curve. For your first 10-20 automations, Zapier gets you productive faster.
Which is cheaper, Make or Zapier?
Make is substantially cheaper at comparable volumes. Make Core costs $9/month for 10,000 credits. Zapier Professional costs $19.99/month for 750 tasks. At 10,000 monthly actions, Zapier costs over $100/month vs Make's $9. At 50,000 monthly actions, the difference reaches $370+/month ($4,400+/year). However, 'credits' (Make) and 'tasks' (Zapier) count differently — Make charges per module action while Zapier excludes built-in tools like filters.
Should I migrate from Zapier to Make?
Migrate if your monthly Zapier bill exceeds $100 and your workflows need branching logic. At 10,000+ tasks/month, Make saves significant money. If your workflows are simple (2-3 step Zaps) and cost is under $50/month, the migration effort likely isn't worth it. There's no automatic migration tool — you'll rebuild workflows manually, typically 1-2 hours per complex scenario.
Do Make and Zapier support AI integrations?
Both platforms now offer strong AI support. Make provides AI Agents, AI Toolkit, AI Content Extractor, and 350+ AI-specific app connectors on all paid plans. Zapier offers 20+ AI app integrations, Zapier Copilot for AI-built automations, and an MCP Server for AI agent connectivity. Make has more native AI tools; Zapier has broader AI app connections.
Which has more integrations?
Zapier leads with 7,000+ app integrations vs Make's 3,000+ standard integrations. However, Make offers 350+ AI-specific connectors. For most mainstream business tools (Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce), both platforms have robust connectors. Zapier's advantage shows with niche, industry-specific, or less common apps.